"The existence of a right to live without the profanation of one’s ancestors and of a right to access knowledge of heritage without pornographic constraints does not constitute a fundamental freedom."

A French judge, ruling that Jeff Koons’ controversial exhibit in Versailles should not be shut down

I find it fantastic that somebody argued that he had a basic human right to live without the profanation of his anscestor, Louis XIV. Would this a less absurd argument in France?

(via squashed)